Ahhhh. Mass at 5:30 last night. The silence. The statues. My God-o-Meter is at about 75 today. Quite an upswing from a couple days ago. Why the shift? I needed silence in a holy, sacred place, so where do I go? Why right on down the block to my local Roman Catholic church of course. Now all I need for perfection is incense. I love the smell of incense, but there is none to be found at Sacred Heart Church. I wonder why the Catholic church decided to get rid of it? Have they all gotten rid of incense? Why? In the Greek Orthodox church there is so much incense floating around my husband sneezed perpetually through the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostomos! But I miss it anyway, even though it made him feel weird. The incense wafting up to heaven is supposed to represent the prayers of the people floating up to God. There’s nothing like the pageantry of a Greek Orthodox church, let me tell you what!
Here at Sacred Heart you sit in the creaky wooden pews with the worn vinyl kneelers, imprinted with the impressions of a thousand knees over the years. The entire church is spotless. You can’t sneak into the quiet. The soles of my Merrells on the vinyl floor announce my entrance. We try to walk quietly to the front pews, where nobody wants to sit but us. We have an unobstructed view, however. The altar, the statue ledges, and all the wood surrounding the tabernacle are made of a light colored almost blond wood reminiscent of the living room furniture style of the 1950s and 60s, highly polished of course. Red, velvety curtains hang high from behind the space, accentuating the area. Long tapers sit on either side of the tabernacle. Curiously, I’ve never seen them lit. Four, thick, yellow candles are alight and grace the altar itself. The priest’s chair sits in front of the altar facing the parishioners and Fr. sits there silently, reflecting back to us all of his ancient 80+ years as he surveys the crowd. It’s a big crowd for a summer night. I see several families filing in, genuflecting toward the altar, and arranging
themselves across the aisle in a noisy fashion. Each family has no less than 4 kids. Good for the perpetuation of the church, I’m sure Fr. is thinking.
Up front I see St. Joseph and St. Anthony of Padua (at least I think it’s this Anthony with the child Jesus standing on a book in Anthony’s arms) on the wall ledges to the right of the altar. A gorgeous bouquet of red flowers grace the table directly below them. On the left ledges stand the Virgin Mary, all blond and blue eyed with baby angels arranged around her feet, her arms are crossed across her bosom, soaking up our adoration. The picture at right is similar, but our Mary has her hair uncovered and of course her arms are different. Next to her, and situated lower, stands Jesus, arms outstretched and exposing his Sacred Heart for all to see. Below them on a table sits a spray of blue flowers and gladioli. Although as I come in, I am always drawn to St. Joseph. He is so overlooked in the pantheon of saints, but I envision him as a gentle, patient, loving father and husband.
There’s nothing like Roman Catholic iconography and statuary. Greek ikons (spelling theirs) are different in that they do not reflect the softer, classical Roman art of their neighbors to the West. Greek ikons are all angular and stern looking. There are also strict guidelines about creating Greek ikons. Not just anybody can produce them. It’s a sacred, sacramental gift. Yet, there’s something about Roman Catholic art that gets me. The rich
colors, the human likeness, the way the statues seem to be looking directly at you in a kind way (unlike Greek ikons, like the one on the left, which look directly at you. You tend to want to turn away from their piercing
gaze). Jesus’ statue in our church, similar to the picture at the right, makes you want to run up and hug him. His arms are outstretched and he’s just waiting to give you a “welcome home” kiss. I am always drawn to these statues for some reason. I don’t like wax figures in museums (too spooky), but I have no problem with Catholic statuary. Interesting. Perhaps it is their benignity or their sacred purpose that reassures me?
There is something comforting about going through the ritual of the Mass without having to even think, really. I have the appropriate parts memorized, except the Daily Offering to the Sacred Heart. I can never remember that one. I can let the liturgy soothe away all the chaos and just absorb it. It’s like a giant anti-depressant for the soul. I can cast off the work week, the draining effects of performance blogging (i.e. coming up with something someone might want to read vs. from the heart meditations), the insane commute each and every day. For once I don’t have to think about doctrine or try to untie the intellectual dogmatic knots that churches create. It’s so easy to just let them do it for me. All I need do is come to the table and eat. And that we did.

After Mass the hubby and I went to our favorite Italian restaurant. I had penne, scallops, and shrimp bathed in mushrooms, fresh tomatoes, and cream sauce. MMMM. After that we went to Target to bug my daughter while she was working and before we went to the Drive-in to see Pirates of the Caribbean, III. I, as usual, wandered over to the book section. As if I don’t have a thousand books to read already, I bought the latest Stephen King novel Lisey’s Story. I even broke down, reveling in my latest Catholic mood, and bought a book by Pope Benedict XVI. I bought Jesus of Nazareth, not because I like this particular Pope, but because I picked it up and started reading the first paragraph of the first chapter (I pick a lot of my books this way). It caught my interest. Unfortunately, and forgive me Catholics, all pictures of the former Cardinal Ratzinger are just downright SCARY (I had a photo on the right, but the server from where it came blocked my using it. I guess they don’t take kindly to criticism of the pope’s appearance). Shades of Sith here. I never knew how much I preferred looking at the beatific John Paul II (above) until this past year filled with Ratzinger pictures in the press. (shudder) They didn’t call Ratzinger God’s bulldog for nothing. But, it’s not up to me to like or dislike the Pope. Papal authority is pretty much irrelevant in this day and age (unless you’re European), similar to the status of the Queen of England. It’s merely a figurehead position. But, I decided to give the guy a chance and read his book. I can’t criticize unless I investigate, right? I’ll let you know what I find. In the meantime, I will go and bask in my spiritual high for the rest of the day, perhaps the rest of the week. TTFN.


**He is so overlooked in the pantheon of saints, but I envision him as a gentle, patient, loving father and husband.**
I think it’s a shame that Joseph so often gets overlooked. He must’ve endured a lot of snickers and talk about the birth of Jesus, since I’m sure his fellow villagers could count. And I’m sure they noticed that Mary’s pregnancy didn’t quite line up with the marriage table, which would’ve meant that either they were very eager, or Mary had been unfaithful. Either way, it couldn’t have been easy to function through that.
Heather,
Yes, poor Joseph. But you gotta give him credit for standing by his woman!
Ok, now I feel bad ’cause I’ve made fun of the Pope. I’m sure I’ve got a disgusting photo of myself somewhere. Maybe I should post that in reparation?
Also, before all you rabid anti-Catholics post here? Remember, I will delete all hateful or nonsensical comments. I let the first comment (jet’s) slide because it’s predictable as hell and frankly I love to see the hateful expose themselves for what they are, but if you want to rail on Catholics, do it elsewhere!
Yes, yes, we know you think Protestants know more than Catholics. Yes, we know Protestants think they have the true religion. Yes, we’ve heard this before. MOVE ON!
LOL, Sith Lord, ha. I see it……..
Noogatiger,
Bad aren’t I?
In Re: to the pink-clad Jesus…
http://theresurgence.com/ab_blog_2007-02-08_jesus_in_a_pink_dress_part_1
Sorry, I know you will probably disagree, but from one “-inist” to another, dudes need their due too.
I kinda like the sterner Jesus… there is a greek Orthodox church near us that does a greek festival every year (yay for baclava, mythos beer, and gyros!). It was interesting and a lot of fun, once I got past the whole “you’re a protestant and are thus going to hell because you are not in the true apastolic church” deal.
And uhh, whoa… I just noticed Jet’s comment and your response…
I’m curious, where did you get the hatefulness from his comment? I’m concerned, because all he did was quote scripture…. I have many a catholic brother and sister in Christ, and while I greatly disagree with them theologically, neither I nor they can get past Deuteronomy’s clear message there.
Not saying you are wrong, or that he doesn’t hate catholics (kinda hard to tell either way from here), but the scripture speaks for itself.
Brad,
Because I’ve heard it before. Whenever I write about Catholics or their statues, etc. I always get one of these comments. It assumes idolatry where there isn’t any. Very judgmental and in my view hateful of Catholics, especially when jet tosses it out there with “this is all I have to say…” End of story. How close minded is that? Where is it written that people can come here, comment as they like and leave without explaining themselves? You know, I think I’ve just convinced myself to delete these right off the bat. Thanks Brad for allowing me to clarify my position.
There, all comments not deemed suitable by either party have been deleted.
From what I understand of the Catholics, they do hold to the same God as the Protestants. In praying to the Virgin Mary or the Saints, they aren’t praying to them as they would to God, but rather asking Mary or the Saints to pray for them, and appeal to God on their behalf. Much as a Christian on Earth would ask another Christian to pray on his/her behalf. So I’ve never understood the idolatry charge.
Good! Read him with an open mind. His homilies and his General Audience talks are amazing – glowing with faith. I love this one on Peter:
His reaction to the miraculous catch showed his amazement and fear: “Depart from me, for I am a sinful man, O Lord” (Lk 5: 8). Jesus replied by inviting him to trust and to be open to a project that would surpass all his expectations. “Do not be afraid; henceforth, you will be catching men” (Lk 5: 10). Peter could not yet imagine that one day he would arrive in Rome and that here he would be a “fisher of men” for the Lord. He accepted this surprising call, he let himself be involved in this great adventure: he was generous; he recognized his limits but believed in the one who was calling him and followed the dream of his heart. He said “yes”, a courageous and generous “yes”, and became a disciple of Jesus.
And this, from this year’s Eater Vigil homily:
This is the joy of the Easter Vigil: we are free. In the resurrection of Jesus, love has been shown to be stronger than death, stronger than evil. Love made Christ descend, and love is also the power by which he ascends. The power by which he brings us with him. In union with his love, borne aloft on the wings of love, as persons of love, let us descend with him into the world’s darkness, knowing that in this way we will also rise up with him. On this night, then, let us pray: Lord, show us that love is stronger than hatred, that love is stronger than death. Descend into the darkness and the abyss of our modern age, and take by the hand those who await you. Bring them to the light! In my own dark nights, be with me to bring me forth! Help me, help all of us, to descend with you into the darkness of all those people who are still waiting for you, who out of the depths cry unto you! Help us to bring them your light! Help us to say the “yes” of love, the love that makes us descend with you and, in so doing, also to rise with you. Amen!
What’s not to like?
Heather,
Exactly! It takes a subtle mind to detect the difference between worship and asking for prayers. Thanks for the understanding on this point!
Thanks for the links, Ellen! I will wander over there. I’m discovering that I should perhaps be a little more humble in the face of more educated men than me. I would like to learn what B16 has to say.
Hmmm… OK, MOI, that does make a little more sense. I apologize for being a tad defensive. I too have not understood the emphasis on Mary and the Saints, but by no means think they love Jesus any less. I guess that, because I am all about Solo Scriptura, it makes me nervous for a church to encourage doctrine not found in scripture (praying to saints, etc.). Why? Well, there just isn’t (at least in my knowledge) anything in scripture that says to do so, and in fact cautions against praying to any name aside from one of the persons of the Trinity. When asked how we should pray, Jesus responded with the Lord’s prayer, to “Our Father in Heaven.”
Meh, also sorry for hijacking the post. I too agree that there are many gorgeous works of art and architecture coming from the Catholic tradition. Tradition in and of itself, is not bad, and can provide a refreshing change from the uber-modern protestant architecture (some anyway).
Brad,
Apologies accepted.
You know there is far more spirituality out there to be explored than what is found between the pages of an ancient text. I imagine God is not threatened when we are mature enough to venture away from the written rule of law and into grace. I think God’s big enough to handle my venturing.
**Why? Well, there just isn’t (at least in my knowledge) anything in scripture that says to do so, and in fact cautions against praying to any name aside from one of the persons of the Trinity. ** I think, in this case, the word “pray” is being used in two different ways. They don’t pray to the saints in the same way they pray to God. It’s more of asking the saints to pray in their behalf, they simply use the phrase “pray to the saints.” But this is prayer in terms of a request, and pray in terms of God is meant along the lines of worship. It probably would stop a lot of confusion if a word other than ‘pray’ was used.
On the other hand, the amount of power given to the Pope and the church itself does make me leery, because where are the checks and balances? We’ve seen in history what happened when the Catholic Church was allowed to rule unchecked — nothing stopped it from some truly heinous acts. But we can say the same thing on any establishment, be it secular or religious. Just look at the Middle Ages, or why the Revolutionary War started in the US.
**Well, there just isn’t (at least in my knowledge) anything in scripture that says to do ** I think part of why the Catholics, and Eastern Orthodox, do things the way they do is because there needs to be a tradition behind the Bible. And I do think they have a point in this — the Bible can’t always stand on its own. For many of the verses, or Paul’s letters, historical and social context is required to get the full meaning. When you’re just looking at a translation, it’s not always enough. One, because words don’t always carry over well and two, there’s bias in terms of the word used for the translation. Catholics and Eastern Orthodox would say that tradition is equally viable because it preserves much of what the early church said, and without tradition, things fall apart. We only need to look at all the Protestant sects to see where the Catholic church is coming from.
Heather,
Methinks you and I are very much on the same page. I appreciate the distinction between usages of the word “pray.” You are quite right there.
The only distinction (clarification, really) I would make is that in scripture, there is not a single communication between someone who has died and someone who has lived. In every case, it has been either God (as whichever person of the Trinity), or an angel. In Greek, the word for angel (“angelos” with a hard “g”) literally means “messenger.” The only instance that comes close to this exception is at the Transfiguration (Mark 9), where Peter, James, and John saw Moses and Elijah speaking with Jesus (saw, not heard). But then again, Jesus is God, so that makes sense.
***”On the other hand, the amount of power given to the Pope and the church itself does make me leery…”*** Agreed and agreed.
***”And I do think they have a point in this — the Bible can’t always stand on its own. For many of the verses, or Paul’s letters, historical and social context is required to get the full meaning. When you’re just looking at a translation, it’s not always enough.”*** On this, I could not agree more. On areas where scripture is silent, there is an assumed neutrality. Culture, for example (and thus tradition) are neutral and to be celebrated reflections of God’s image.
However, the line MUST be drawn where culture (or anything else of neutral nature) is
1.) Treated equal to or on par with scripture, or
2.) In direct contradiction or conflict with scripture.
This is where I think many Protestants have a problem with tradition in the Catholic and Greek-Orthodox church, and where I would have to agree.
Aside from that, all things should be allowed and even celebrated.
REALLY good thoughts!
Brad,
I direct you to more energetic Catholic minds than mine concerning the saints and prayers directed toward heaven:
http://www.scripturecatholic.com/saints.html
Before as a fundamentalist I would have agreed with you and headed straight to the scriptures to confirm or not confirm a teaching, but I no longer see a problem with Church Tradition and Scriptures since Scripture came out of Tradition and not the other way around. The Didache is a wonderful resource for early Christian teaching, ones that show everyone was referred to the bishop, priest, or deacon for instruction as there was no “bible” to refer to. What did believers do for the couple of hundred years when there was no bible? Are you saying that for a couple of hundred years and even beyond when the bible was not available to the ordinary Christian that they were living in error? How did God keep error out of the church without this “reference book?”
You know these arguments Brad, we are simply rehashing years of the same debate. Again, here’s a better explanation from sturdier minds:
http://www.americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm?article_id=5494
I believe in COMMUNITY and the concept of the word of God as heard through the community. I will say it once again. God is not confined to the pages of one ancient text compiled over the course of several hundred years. God’s incarnational ministry is through human beings by the power of the Spirit.
I think we must therefore agree to disagree about turning to the scriptures when discussing points of contention because this itself is a point of contention.
Blessings…